Buck Converter Design Guide: Inductor, Capacitor, and Efficiency
How to design a synchronous buck converter from scratch. Calculates duty cycle, inductor value, output capacitor, and estimates efficiency with worked examples.
When to Use a Buck Converter vs. LDO
A linear regulator (LDO) is simple and quiet but dissipates all excess voltage as heat: P = (V_in − V_out) × I_out. At 12V→3.3V at 1A, that's 8.7W lost — requiring a heatsink and wasting 73% of input power.
A buck converter achieves 85–95% efficiency but requires an inductor, output capacitor, and either a dedicated controller or integrated power IC. The crossover point where a buck becomes worth the complexity:
For typical PCB designs: if (V_in − V_out) × I_out > 0.5W, consider a buck.
Fundamental Equations
Duty cycle (continuous conduction mode):For first-pass calculations, assume η = 0.88 (88% efficiency).
Inductor value for a given ripple current (typically 20–40% of I_out):This is the ideal minimum. In practice, add ESR of the capacitor: ΔV_ESR = ΔI_L × ESR.
Worked Example: 12V → 5V at 2A
Given: V_in = 12V, V_out = 5V, I_out = 2A, f_sw = 400 kHz1. Duty cycle: D = 5 / (12 × 0.88) = 0.473 (47.3%)
2. Ripple current (30% of I_out): ΔI_L = 0.6A
3. Inductor: L = 5 × (1 − 0.473) / (0.6 × 400,000) = 11 µH → use 10 µH standard
4. Output capacitor (ΔV = 50 mV): C = 0.6 / (8 × 400,000 × 0.05) = 3.75 µF → use 10 µF for margin
5. Inductor peak current: I_peak = 2 + 0.3 = 2.3A — select inductor rated ≥2.5A
Inductor Selection
Key specs:
- Inductance value ±20% is fine; ferrite cores drift with DC bias
- Saturation current > I_peak (never saturate the core — efficiency collapses)
- DCR (DC resistance) — lower is better; P = I²×DCR
- SRF (self-resonant frequency) > 2× f_sw
Capacitor Selection
For output capacitors, ceramic X5R or X7R is preferred. Avoid Y5V (high capacitance loss vs. DC bias). Electrolytic can be used in parallel for bulk capacitance.
For input capacitors, place a 10–100 µF bulk cap near the converter plus 1 µF ceramic at the IC pins. The switching current drawn from the input is pulsed — poor input decoupling causes noise across the board.
Efficiency Losses
Main loss mechanisms: 1. Conduction loss: I²×R in the FETs and inductor DCR 2. Switching loss: P_sw = 0.5 × V_in × I_out × t_sw × f_sw (proportional to f_sw) 3. Gate charge loss: P_g = Q_g × V_gs × f_sw per FET 4. Inductor core loss: frequency and flux-dependent, from the core datasheet
At 400 kHz with typical components, expect 88–92% efficiency. At 1 MHz, switching losses increase — efficiency may drop to 83–87% unless you use advanced FETs.
Model your design with the Buck Converter Calculator to compute duty cycle, inductor size, and capacitor requirements before placing a component order.