Skip to content
RFrftools.io
EMC

Shielding Effectiveness Calculator

Calculate electromagnetic shielding effectiveness, absorption loss, reflection loss, and skin depth. Evaluate enclosure materials per MIL-STD-285.

Loading calculator...

Formula

SE=A+R=8.686×(t/δ)+20×log10(∣1+η0/ηs∣/2)SE = A + R = 8.686×(t/δ) + 20×log₁₀(|1+η₀/η_s|/2)

Reference: MIL-STD-285, Schulz et al.

SE— Total shielding effectiveness (dB)
A— Absorption loss (dB)
R— Reflection loss (dB)
δ— Skin depth (m)
t— Shield thickness (m)
σ— Conductivity (S/m)
μ_r— Relative permeability

How It Works

The Shielding Effectiveness Calculator computes electromagnetic attenuation for conductive enclosures — essential for EMC compliance (CISPR 32, FCC Part 15), medical device immunity (IEC 60601-1-2), and military specifications (MIL-STD-461G). EMC engineers use this to achieve 40-80 dB shielding required for sensitive electronics protection.

Per Henry Ott's 'EMC Engineering' and MIL-HDBK-419A, shielding effectiveness SE = A + R + B, where A is absorption loss, R is reflection loss, and B is re-reflection correction (negligible when A > 10 dB). Absorption loss A = 8.686 x t/delta, where t is thickness and delta = sqrt(2/(omega x mu x sigma)) is skin depth. At 1 GHz, copper skin depth is 2.1 um; a 1mm copper sheet provides A > 400 dB.

Reflection loss R = 20 x log10(Z0/4Zs), where Z0 = 377 ohm (free space) and Zs = sqrt(omega x mu/sigma) is shield impedance. Copper at 1 GHz has Zs = 0.026 ohm, giving R = 20 x log10(377/(4 x 0.026)) = 67 dB. Total SE for copper exceeds 100 dB — but real enclosures have apertures.

Per Ott, apertures dominate shielding failure. A single slot of length L reduces SE to approximately 20 x log10(lambda/(2L)) at frequencies where L > lambda/2. A 10cm slot (f_cutoff = 1.5 GHz) provides only 0 dB shielding at 1.5 GHz and negative SE (resonant amplification) above. CISPR 32 Class B requires 40 dBuV/m limit — enclosure apertures must be sized to provide 20+ dB margin.

Worked Example

Problem: Design aluminum enclosure (sigma = 3.77e7 S/m, mu_r = 1) with 2mm wall thickness for 40 dB shielding at 1 GHz. Maximum ventilation slot length?

Solution per Ott:

  1. Skin depth at 1 GHz: delta = sqrt(2/(2 x pi x 1e9 x 4 x pi x 1e-7 x 3.77e7)) = 2.6 um
  2. Absorption loss: A = 8.686 x 0.002/2.6e-6 = 6680 dB (wall is not limiting factor)
  3. Reflection loss: Zs = sqrt(2 x pi x 1e9 x 4 x pi x 1e-7/3.77e7) = 0.032 ohm; R = 20 x log10(377/(4 x 0.032)) = 66 dB
  4. Enclosure SE without apertures: >100 dB
  5. For 40 dB at 1 GHz with apertures: SE_aperture = 20 x log10(lambda/(2L)); lambda = 0.3m at 1 GHz
  6. 40 = 20 x log10(0.3/(2L)); 100 = 0.3/(2L); L = 1.5mm maximum slot length
  7. For 20 ventilation slots: use honeycomb waveguide-beyond-cutoff filter (5mm cells provide >60 dB at 1 GHz)

Result: 2mm aluminum provides >100 dB material SE, but slots must be <1.5mm for 40 dB. Use honeycomb filter for ventilation.

Practical Tips

  • ✓Size apertures to lambda/20 maximum — per Ott, this provides 26 dB margin versus lambda/2 resonance. At 1 GHz (lambda=30cm), max aperture = 15mm; at 3 GHz, max = 5mm.
  • ✓Use conductive gaskets at all seams — EMI gaskets (BeCu fingerstock, conductive foam) maintain <10 mohm contact resistance required for 40+ dB SE per MIL-HDBK-419A.
  • ✓Place EMI filters at cable entry points — feedthrough capacitors provide 40-60 dB; Pi-filters provide 60-80 dB. Filter must be bonded to enclosure for proper ground reference.

Common Mistakes

  • ✗Assuming material SE equals enclosure SE — material provides 60-100+ dB but apertures (seams, ventilation, displays) typically limit real enclosures to 20-60 dB. Per Ott, a single untreated seam can reduce SE to <10 dB.
  • ✗Using DC conductivity for high-frequency calculations — skin effect confines current to surface; surface finish (oxidation, paint) can add 10-20 dB loss. Use measured surface resistance or specify conductive finish.
  • ✗Ignoring cable penetrations — unfiltered cables act as slot antennas inside shielded enclosures. Per MIL-STD-461G, all cables must be filtered at point of entry or use shielded/filtered connectors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Copper (sigma = 5.8e7 S/m) and aluminum (sigma = 3.77e7 S/m) are most common, providing >80 dB material SE above 100 kHz. For magnetic shielding below 100 kHz, use mu-metal (mu_r = 20,000-100,000) which achieves 40-60 dB by redirecting magnetic flux. Per Ott, 0.5mm copper provides equivalent SE to 1mm aluminum due to higher conductivity.
Absorption loss A = 8.686 x t/delta. When t >> delta (typical for metals above 1 MHz), SE increases 8.7 dB per skin depth of thickness. At 1 MHz, copper skin depth = 66 um; 1mm copper provides 130 dB absorption. At 1 GHz, delta = 2.1 um; even 0.1mm copper provides >400 dB absorption — apertures always dominate.
Yes significantly — per MIL-HDBK-419A, non-conductive paint adds 20-40 dB loss at seam interfaces by increasing contact resistance. Solutions: (1) mask mating surfaces from paint; (2) use conductive paint (nickel or copper filled); (3) specify chromate conversion or conductive anodize for aluminum. Surface oxidation alone can add 10 dB loss.
1-10 GHz is most challenging because: (1) apertures of practical size (>5mm) approach resonance; (2) cable/connector transitions have significant leakage; (3) gasket contact impedance creates slots. Per CISPR 32, radiated limits extend to 6 GHz. Above 10 GHz, smaller wavelength makes aperture control easier. Below 100 kHz, reflection loss decreases — magnetic shielding required.
Per MIL-STD-461G: (1) Overlap seams by 1/4 wavelength at highest frequency (7.5mm at 10 GHz); (2) Use continuous conductive gaskets — BeCu fingerstock for removable panels, conductive foam for permanent seams; (3) Space fasteners at lambda/20 intervals; (4) Ensure <2.5 mohm contact resistance across full seam length. EMI gaskets add $2-10/meter but provide 20-40 dB improvement over bare metal contact.

Related Articles

EMC / Compliance

Why Your Enclosure Rings & How to Predict It

Calculate chassis resonant frequencies from enclosure dimensions. Avoid EMC failures by predicting TE₁₀₁ and TE₁₁₀ cavity modes in metal housings.

EMC

EMC Design: Pass CE/FCC Testing First Try

A practical guide to EMC pre-compliance testing, PCB layout for low emissions, and common failure modes that cause first-attempt failures at the test house.

EMC / Compliance

Predicting Radiated Emissions Before FCC Testing

A hardware startup's SBC fails FCC Part 15 Class B pre-compliance on the first scan. Follow the analysis in the EMI Radiated Emissions Estimator to identify.

Shop Components

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Copper Foil Tape

Copper foil tape for EMI shielding and grounding

Amazon →

Ferrite Bead Kit

SMD ferrite bead assortment for suppressing high-frequency noise

Amazon →

Related Calculators

RF

Skin Depth

Calculate skin depth and surface resistance for copper, aluminum, and other conductors at any frequency. Essential for RF shielding and PCB design. Free, instant results.

RF

VSWR / Return Loss

Convert between VSWR, return loss, reflection coefficient, and mismatch loss instantly. Get reflected and transmitted power percentages. Free, instant results.

RF

dBm Converter

Convert dBm to watts, milliwatts, dBW, dBuV, and Vrms instantly. Enter power level and impedance for all RF power unit conversions. Free, instant results.

EMC

Ferrite Bead

Calculate ferrite bead impedance, insertion loss, and DC voltage drop at any frequency. Select EMI filter beads for power supply decoupling.